When a retail company has 500 store locations, how should it determine whether each store is a separate asset group or whether stores should be combined under ASC 360-10-35-23?

ture cash flows expected from use and eventual disposition. If carrying amount exceeds undiscounted cash flows, step two measures impairment as the excess of carrying amount over fair value of the asset group (ASC 360-10-35-17). - Allocating the impairment loss: Per ASC 360-10-35-28, once the group-level loss is determined, it is allocated pro rata to long-lived assets within the group based on relative carrying amounts — but no individual asset can be written below its own fair value (if determinable without undue cost or effort). Goodwill is excluded from the allocation. - Triggering events (indicators of impairment): ASC 360-10-35-21 lists indicators including significant adverse changes in business climate, a current-period operating or cash-flow loss combined with a history of losses, and an expectation that the asset will be disposed of significantly before the end of its useful life. - Presentation and disclosure: ASC 360-10-50-2 requires disclosure of the facts and circumstances leading to the impairment, the amount of the loss, the method of determining fair value, and the segment in which the impaired asset resides. Practical example A manufacturing company has a plant (PP&E carrying amount $8M),

If an asset group fails the step-one recoverability test but the fair value of individual assets within the group exceeds their carrying amounts, is an impairment loss still recognized at the group level?

related equipment ($2M), and associated deferred revenue liability ($1M) that together represent the lowest level of independent cash flows. Step 1 — Recoverability test: - Carrying amount of asset group: $8M + $2M − $1M = $9M - Undiscounted future cash flows: $7.5M - $9M > $7.5M → impairment indicated; proceed to step 2. Step 2 — Fair value measurement: - Fair value of asset group (Level 3 DCF): $6M - Impairment loss: $9M − $6M = $3M Allocation (pro rata to long-lived assets, excluding the liability): - Plant: $8M / $10M × $3M = $2.4M write-down - Equipment: $2M / $10M × $3M = $0.6M write-down Journal entry: | Account | Dr | Cr | |---|---|---| | Impairment Loss — Plant | 2,400,000 | | | Impairment Loss — Equipment | 600,000 | | | Accumulated Impairment — Plant | | 2,400,000 | | Accumulated Impairment — Equipment | | 600,000 | The impairment loss flows through income from continuing operations unless the asset group meets held-for-sale criteria (ASC 360-10-45-5). Common pitfalls - Grouping too high: Practitioners frequently define the asset group at the reportable segment or entity level because cash flow data is more readily available. This violates ASC 360-10-35-23's "lowest level" requirement and can m

How does the ASC 360 asset group interact with a reporting unit under ASC 350 goodwill impairment testing — specifically when the same assets are included in both analyses?

ask impairment of underperforming operations hidden inside a profitable segment. - Excluding related liabilities: Forgetting to net assumed liabilities (e.g., asset retirement obligations, deferred revenue) from the carrying amount tested in step one artificially inflates the group's book value, making impairment harder to detect — a frequent audit finding. - Confusing undiscounted vs. discounted cash flows: Step 1 uses undiscounted cash flows (a conservative screen), while step 2 uses fair value (typically a discounted cash flow model). Using discounted flows in step 1 is a common CPA exam trap and a real-world error that leads to premature or missed impairment charges. Key paragraphs to know - ASC 360-10-35-17 — The recoverability test: carrying amount vs. undiscounted cash flows; fair value measurement of loss. - ASC 360-10-35-22 and 35-23 — Asset group composition and the "lowest level of largely independent cash flows" definition. - ASC 360-10-35-21 — Impairment indicators / triggering events requiring a recoverability test. - ASC 360-10-35-28 — Pro-rata allocation of group-level impairment loss to individual long-lived assets. - ASC 360-10-50-2 — Required disclosures for recognized impairment losses.

ASC 360 Asset Group Definition

Q: How is an asset group defined for impairment testing under ASC 360?

Core rule Under ASC 360 Asset Group Definition guidance, an asset group is the lowest level of identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of the cash flows of other groups of assets and liabilities — and impairment testing is performed at that level, not at the individual asset level. How it works - Identifying the asset group: Per ASC 360-10-35-23, a long-lived asset or group of long-lived assets to be held and used must be grouped with other assets and liabilities at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent. "Largely independent" is a facts-and-circumstances judgment — interdependency of cash inflows is the primary driver, not shared costs or overhead allocations. - Assets and liabilities included: ASC 360-10-35-22 requires that other assets not subject to ASC 360 (e.g., working capital, goodwill) and related liabilities be included in the asset group when their inclusion affects the carrying amount tested against undiscounted cash flows. This prevents artificial inflation or deflation of the group's carrying amount. - The two-step recoverability test: Under ASC 360-10-35-17, step one compares the carrying amount of the asset group to the sum of undiscounted fu

US GAAP BuddyAI-Powered

How is an asset group defined for impairment testing under ASC 360?

ASC 360 Asset — Core Rule

Under ASC 360 Asset Group Definition guidance, an asset group is the lowest level of identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of the cash flows of other groups of assets and liabilities — and impairment testing is performed at that level, not at the individual asset level.

ASC 360 Asset Group Definition

ASC 360 Asset — Core Rule

How ASC 360 Asset Works