Updated 3 June 2026 · Reviewed by US GAAP Buddy Editorial Team
A contingent loss must be accrued (recognized in the financial statements) when both (1) it is probable that an asset has been impaired or a liability has been incurred as of the balance-sheet date, and (2) the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. If either criterion is not met, disclosure in the notes (not accrual) is required instead (ASC 450-20-25-1).
Accrual entry (as of December 31, 20X3):
| Account | Debit | Credit |
|---|---|---|
| Loss on litigation (P&L) | $2,500,000 | |
| Accrued product liability (Balance Sheet—current liability) | $2,500,000 |
Balance sheet impact: Current liabilities increase by $2.5M; shareholders' equity decreases by $2.5M (via retained earnings reduction).
Disclosure in the notes should identify the claim, the range of exposure ($2.0M–$3.5M), the basis for the estimate, and any material uncertainties (ASC 450-20-50-1).
If legal counsel had opined "reasonably possible" instead of "probable," no accrual would be recorded, but a note disclosure of the $2.0M–$3.5M range would be required.
The recognition threshold for contingent losses requires both conditions to be present simultaneously as of the balance sheet date. First, it must be probable that a liability has been incurred — meaning the future confirming event is likely to occur. "Probable" under ASC 450 is interpreted in practice as a high likelihood (often characterized as greater than 70%), though no explicit percentage threshold is codified. Second, the amount of the loss must be reasonably estimable; a probable but unquantifiable loss is disclosed but not accrued. Neither condition alone is sufficient for recognition.
When both the probability and estimability conditions of ASC 450-20-25-1 are satisfied, recognition of the contingent loss is mandatory — it is not a management election or a choice to be made based on disclosure strategy. The charge must appear in the income statement (typically as "provision for legal matters," "litigation expense," or an equivalent caption) with a corresponding liability on the balance sheet. There is no option to defer accrual to a future quarter once both conditions are met as of the reporting date, even if the case remains open, settlement negotiations are ongoing, or no demand letter has been received.
When a range of possible loss amounts is estimable and one amount within the range is more likely than the others, accrue that most-likely amount and disclose the range. When no single outcome in the range is more likely than any other, accrue the minimum (low end) of the range — not the midpoint, and not the maximum. Accruing the midpoint when no single estimate is more likely is a frequent audit finding that overstates the liability. The difference between the accrued amount and the high end of the range must be disclosed in the notes as additional exposure.
For contingencies that are "reasonably possible" (more than remote but less than probable) or that are probable but not yet reasonably estimable, the entity must disclose in the notes: (1) the nature of the contingency, (2) an estimate of the possible loss or range of loss, and (3) if an estimate cannot be made, a statement to that effect. Omitting the quantified range when it can be estimated is a disclosure deficiency. The obligation to disclose persists until the contingency is resolved, reversed, or the exposure becomes remote.
A contingency is remote if the chance of the future event is slight. Remote contingencies require neither accrual nor note disclosure under ASC 450 — with one important exception: guarantees (written put options, financial guarantees, residual value guarantees) must be disclosed under ASC 460 even when the underlying obligation is considered remote. In practice, legal counsel seldom opines that litigation exposure is "remote," as doing so exposes the entity and counsel to criticism if a loss subsequently materializes. The threshold is applied conservatively, and "remote" designations are auditor-scrutinized.