Updated 16 August 2026 · Reviewed by US GAAP Buddy Editorial Team
Under ASC 606 Contract Modifications, a change in the scope or price of a contract is accounted for as either a new separate contract or a modification of the existing contract, depending on whether the change adds distinct goods or services at their standalone selling price.
ASC 606-10-25-10 defines a contract modification as a change in the scope or price (or both) of a contract that is approved by the parties. Approval can be written, oral, or implied by customary business practice — but unapproved changes create a variable consideration question, not a modification.
Scenario: A SaaS company contracts to deliver 12 months of software access for $120,000 ($10,000/month). After month 4 (revenue recognized: $40,000), the customer requests an additional module for months 5–12 for an extra $6,400 total — but the standalone selling price of that module would be $8,000. Because the new module is distinct but not at standalone selling price, the company applies the prospective termination-and-replacement approach (ASC 606-10-25-13(a)).
Remaining consideration: Original unearned $80,000 + modification $6,400 = $86,400 recognized over 8 remaining months = $10,800/month.
Month 5 entry (and each subsequent month):
| Account | Dr | Cr |
|---|---|---|
| Accounts Receivable | 10,800 | |
| Revenue — SaaS Subscriptions | 10,800 |
Now assume instead the modification involved adding more hours to an already-in-progress software implementation (a single, non-distinct performance obligation). If total expected costs increase and the modification changes the measure of progress, a cumulative catch-up applies:
| Account | Dr | Cr |
|---|---|---|
| Contract Asset | 3,200 | |
| Revenue — Implementation Services | 3,200 |
(Represents the incremental revenue earned to date under revised completion percentage.)
Frequently Asked Questions
How do you know if a contract modification should be treated as a new contract or a modification of the existing one?
Under ASC 606-10-25-12, a modification is treated as a new separate contract only when it adds distinct goods or services AND those goods or services are priced at their standalone selling price. If either condition fails, the modification is instead accounted for prospectively (termination-and-replacement) or through a cumulative catch-up adjustment, depending on whether the remaining goods or services are distinct.
What's the difference between the prospective and cumulative catch-up approaches for contract modifications?
The prospective approach (ASC 606-10-25-13(a)) applies when remaining goods or services are distinct but not priced at standalone selling price — the original contract is terminated and revenue is recognized going forward on the blended remaining consideration. The cumulative catch-up approach (ASC 606-10-25-13(b)) applies when the remaining goods or services are not distinct — revenue recognized to date is adjusted immediately to reflect the modified terms.